How publicly funded research preserves scientific integrity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/cjsc.v1i1.3948Keywords:
Government funding, Funding bias, Research & Development, Policy, DisinformationAbstract
Government funding for science has been under threat. Corporations and private industries (who already make up the majority of research and development funding in Canada) are often the favourites to make up the deficit when public funding gets axed. However, private funding for science can introduce conflicts of interest, biases, and profit-motivated agendas, while public funding is proven to result in impartial, ethical, and people-first science full of long-term benefits. This article explores the implications of corporate funding on scientific integrity by examining the checks and balances of the public funding system, examples of funding bias, and the dangers of disinformation. It becomes clear that candid funding disclosures, transparency of research initiatives, and standards to regulate commercial-science interactions are needed to preserve scientific integrity, for our own good.
References
References
Johnson, M. Stagnant investments in training and research compromise Canada’s economic growth [Internet] The Globe and Mail; 2024 Feb [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/commentary/article-stagnant-investments-in-training-and-research-compromise-canadas/
The Canadian Association for Neuroscience. Increased investment in scientific research: An investment in the health and prosperity of Canadians today and tomorrow [internet]. House of Commons of Canada; n.d. [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
Statistics Canada. Expenditures on research and development (R&D) by performing sector [internet]. Government of Canada; 2024 Dec [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=2710027302
Allen, S. Benefits and drawbacks of privatizing science [internet]. American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2024 Apr [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
https://www.aaas.org/taxonomy/term/7/benefits-and-drawbacks-privatizing-science
Lalani, H. S., Nagar, S., Sarpatwari, A., Barenie, R. E., Avorn, J., Rome, B. N., & Kesselheim, A. S. US public investment in development of mRNA covid-19 vaccines: retrospective cohort study
(2023). US public investment in development of mRNA covid-19 vaccines: retrospective cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2023;380(e073747):587. doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-073747
Van Beusekom, M. 35 years of US investment in research led to development of mRNA COVID vaccines [internet]. Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, University of Minnesota; 2023 Mar [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
Finucane, M. What’s Wrong with Billionaires Dictating the US Science Agenda? [internet]. Union of Concerned Scientists; 2024 Nov [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
https://blog.ucs.org/melissa-finucane/whats-wrong-with-billionaires-dictating-the-us-science-agenda/
Canadian Tri-Council. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans – TCPS 2 [internet]. Government of Canada; 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from: https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique_tcps2-eptc2_2022.html
The Health Canada and Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) Research Ethics Board (REB). Research Ethics Board: Overview of the Health Canada and Public Health Agency of Canada REB [internet]. Government of Canada; 2024 Apr [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/science-research/science-advice-decision-making/research-ethics-board.html
Leo, G. 'No consequences' for violating human rights in privately funded research in Canada, says ethics expert [internet]. CBC News; 2024 Dec [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saskatchewan/ethics-research-canada-privately-funded-1.7393063
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Tri-Agency Interdisciplinary Peer Review Committee [internet]. Government of Canada; 2024 Apr [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/52470.html
Fabbri, A., Lai, A., Grundy, Q., & Bero, L. A. The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda: A Scoping Review.” Am J Public Health. 2018;108(11):9-16. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304677
Bero, L., Oostvogel, F., Bacchetti, P., & Lee, K. Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others. PLoS medicine. 2007;4(6):184. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040184
Lesser, L. I., Ebbeling, C. B., Goozner, M., Wypij, D., & Ludwig, D. S. Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS medicine. 2007:4(1):5. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040005
Fabbri, A., Chartres, N., Scrinis, G., Bero, L.A. Study sponsorship and the nutrition research agenda: analysis of randomized controlled trials included in systematic reviews of nutrition interventions to address obesity. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(7):1306-13. doi:10.1017/S1368980016003128
Washburn, J. University, Inc.: The corporate corruption of American higher education. Basic Books/Hachette Book Group; 2005. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-13473-000
Brownlee, J. Academia, Inc. How Corporatization Is Transforming Canadian Universities. Fernwood Publishing; 2015.
https://fernwoodpublishing.ca/book/academia-inc
Berman, E. P. Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine. Princeton University Press; 2012.
https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691147086/creating-the-market-university
Hiltner, S., Eaton, E., Healy, N., Scerri, A., Stephens, J.C., Supran, G. Fossil fuel industry influence in higher education: A review and a research agenda. WIREs Climate Change. 2024;15(6):904. doi:10.1002/wcc.904
Gundle, K. R., Dingel, M. J., & Koenig, B. A. 'To prove this is the industry's best hope': big tobacco's support of research on the genetics of nicotine addiction. Addiction. 2010;105(6):974-83. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02940.x
Barnes, D. E., & Bero, L. A. Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996;21(3):515-42. doi:10.1215/03616878-21-3-515
Fabbri, A., Holland, T. J., & Bero, L. A. Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(18):3422-3430. doi:10.1017/S1368980018002100
O’Connor, A. Coca-Cola Funds Scientists Who Shift Blame for Obesity Away From Bad Diets [internet]. The New York Times; 2015 Aug [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
Huehnergarth, N. Emails Reveal How Coca-Cola Shaped The Anti-Obesity Global Energy Balance Network [internet]. Forbes; 2015 Nov [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
Bero, L. When big companies fund academic research, the truth often comes last [internet]. The Conversation; 2019 Oct [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
Yano, E. Japanese spousal smoking study revisited: how a tobacco industry funded paper reached erroneous conclusions. Tob Control. 20015;14(4):227-34. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.007377
Kubini, U. Science Has a Major Fraud Problem. Here’s Why Government Funding Is the Likely Culprit [internet]. Foundation for Economic Education; 2024 Jan [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
Carlisle, J. B. False individual patient data and zombie randomised controlled trials submitted to Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2020;76(4):472-9. doi:10.1111/anae.15263
Carlisle, J. B. Data fabrication and other reasons for non-random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(8):944-52. doi:10.1111/anae.13938
Glenna, L., Bruce, A. Suborning science for profit: Monsanto, glyphosate, and private science research misconduct. Research Policy. 2021;50(7). doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104290
Miron, J., Winter, J. Governments Should Not Fund Research [internet]. CATO Institute; 2023 Jul [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
https://www.cato.org/blog/governments-should-not-fund-research
The CATO Institute. CATO Handbook for Policymakers (9th ed.) [internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
https://www.cato.org/cato-handbook-policymakers/cato-handbook-policymakers-9th-edition-2022
Edwards, C. Labor Unions Against the Public Interest [internet]. The CATO Institute; 2013 Jul [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
https://www.cato.org/blog/labor-unions-against-public-interest
Powell, B. A Case against Child Labor Prohibitions [internet]. The CATO Institute; 2014 Jul [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
https://www.cato.org/economic-development-bulletin/case-against-child-labor-prohibitions
Mercola, J. FDA Rubber-Stamps Fake Salmon With No Independent Testing, No Public Review [internet]. The Defender; 2025 Jul [cited 2025 Aug 10] Available from:
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Katherine Myers

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.