Universal vs. Private: How Healthcare Delivery Models Shape Equity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15173/mujph.v3i1.4096Keywords:
equity, healthcare, universal healthcare, private healthcare, Canada, United States, United Kingdom, insurance, Medicare, Canadian Health ActAbstract
Delivering optimal healthcare involves navigating a complex interplay of factors, with healthcare delivery systems and equity standing out prominently. This editorial aims to contrast healthcare models in Canada, the United States of America (USA), and the United Kingdom (UK) to analyze their implications on equity. The universal healthcare model, exemplified by Canada's Medicare system, ensures access to essential services for all citizens, minimizing financial barriers and promoting social equity. Contrastingly, the USA primarily operates a private, for-profit healthcare system, where access and quality of care vary widely, often leading to disparities. The UK's National Health Service
(NHS) offers universal coverage funded through taxation, supplemented by a less prevalent private sector. This article highlights the intricate relationship between healthcare delivery systems and equity, shedding light on the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with MUJPH agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant MUJPH the right to be the first publisher of the submitted work. The submission will be licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to reference/cite, and share the work with an acknowledgment of the original authorship and initial publication in MUJPH.
- With an appropriate acknowledgment of the work's initial publication in MUJPH, authors may submit their work to other entities with non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work in MUJPH.
- Authors are permitted to share the final and published version of the work online.
