Education Assessment Mechanisms
Developing a Handbook
Abstract
Assessment-based teaching methods in higher education do not accurately reflect student understanding (Gernsbacher, Soicher, and Becker-Blease, 2020). Instructors often have little freedom in how they teach, face issues such as large class sizes, and have few allocated resources. In turn, students face unfair assessments, such as time- limited and standardized tests that depend on rote memorization and fail to promote active learning. Drawing from literature and personal anecdotes, this research aims to answer: What practices and assessment schemes promote accurate assessment of student understanding? This research is aimed at instructors to take more control of their classrooms and provide their students with more valuable and effective learning experiences. My findings indicate that these methods will not only give instructors more control over what they teach, but students will also become engaged, active, and inspired interdisciplinary learners.
Gernsbacher, Soicher, and Becker-Blease, 2020. Four empirically-based reasons not to administer time-limited tests, Translational Issues in Psychological Science. 6(2) pp. 175-190. 10.1037/tps0000232
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).