The Role of Public Health Communication in Combating Vaccine Hesitancy: A Historical Comparison

Authors

  • Isabel Dewey Editor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15173/sciential.v1i5.2556

Keywords:

MMR, smallpox, vaccine, science communication

Abstract

In the current COVID-19 global health crisis, discussions of vaccine safety and hesitancy are being brought to light, as they were during many historical pandemics. In order to suggest effective public health interventions, it is important to examine the historically conventional interventions implemented during previous pandemics. In this review, the governmental role and communication strategies during the smallpox and the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine hesitancies are compared. Specifically, it assesses how these factors may have contributed to vaccine hesitancy and the difference in outcomes. This discussion emphasizes the importance of effective science communication and public health interventions in the prevention and eradication of diseases.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-04

How to Cite

Dewey, I. (2020). The Role of Public Health Communication in Combating Vaccine Hesitancy: A Historical Comparison. Sciential - McMaster Undergraduate Science Journal, 1(5), 31-33. https://doi.org/10.15173/sciential.v1i5.2556

Issue

Section

Opinion Piece