Daily Targeted Evidence Reports for Orthopaedic Surgeons: A Mixed Methods Study In India
Abstract
Background: There is limited research on how web-based, point-of-care, evidence-based medicine (EBM) tools, such as evidence summaries, are being implemented and used in developing countries.
Objectives: To investigate accessibility, use, and impact of an online EBM knowledge dissemination portal in orthopaedic surgery. To explore whether receiving daily targeted evidence summaries results in more frequent use of an EBM tool compared with receiving general weekly reports. To identify and explain the barriers and benefits of a point-of-care resource in the Indian context.
Methods: Orthopaedic surgeons (n = 44) in Pune, India, were provided free access to OrthoEvidence (OE), a for-profit, online EBM knowledge dissemination portal. Participants were subsequently randomized to an Intervention group receiving daily targeted evidence summaries or a Control group receiving general weekly summaries. This study employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design that incorporated two questionnaires, OE usage data, and semi-structured interviews to gain insight into the surgeons’ usage, perceptions and impact of OE.
Results: There were no observable differences in OE usage between the Intervention and Control groups. OE was deemed to be comprehensive, practical, useful, and applicable to clinical practice by the majority of surgeons. The exit survey data revealed no differences between groups’ perceptions of the OE tool. Semi-structured interviews revealed barriers to keeping up with evidence that included limited access to relevant medical literature (limited internet connection, lack of time, minimal access to medical journals) and limited incentive to keep up with it (limited decision-making powers for residents, textbook-based residency curriculum, lack of research methods knowledge, limited context-specific research). Changing trauma practices at the hospital were noted following the intervention.
Recommendations: The practice of EBM and the use of point-of-care tools in India can be promoted by improving internet access and by integrating EBM into training programs and surgical cultures.
References
Guyatt, G, Rennie, D, Meade M, Cook D. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. JAMA & Archives Journals. 2008.
Montori V, Guyatt G. Progress in Evidence-Based Medicine. JAMA. 2008; 300(15): 1814-1816.
Sackett D, Rosenberg W, Gray J, Haynes R, Richardson W. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996; 312(7023): 71-72.
Smith R, Rennie D. Evidence based medicine--an oral history. JAMA. 2014; 311(4): 365-367.
Agarwal R, Kalita J, Misra U. Barriers to evidence-based medicine practice in South Asia and possible solutions. Neurology Asia. 2008; 13(3): 87-94.
Hurwitz S, Tornetta P, Wright J. An AOA critical issue how to read the literature to change your practice: an evidence-based medicine approach. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2006; 88(8): 1873-1879.
Prasad K. Evidence-based medicine in India. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2013; 66(1): 6-9.
Zaidi Z, Hashim J, Iqbal M, Quadri K. Paving the way for evidence-based medicine in Pakistan. JPMA. 2007; 57(11): 556-60.
Al Omari M, Khader Y, Jadallah K, Dauod A, Al-Shdifat A, Khasawneh N. Evidence-based medicine among hospital doctors in Jordan: awareness, attitude and practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2009; 15(6): 1137-1141.
McCord G, Smucker W, Selius B, Hannan S, Davidson E, Schrop S et al. Answering Questions at the Point of Care: Do Residents Practice EBM or Manage Information Sources?. Academic Medicine. 2007; 82(3): 298-303.
Wilkinson E, Bosanquet A, Salisbury C, Hasler J, Bosanquet N. Original Paper: Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of evidence-based medicine in general practice: a qualitative study. European Journal of General Practice. 1999; 5(2): 66-70.
Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Lavis J, Hill S, Squires J. Knowledge translation of research findings. Implementation Science. 2012; 7(1), 50.
Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham I. Defining knowledge translation. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2009;181(3-4):165-168.
Al-Almaie S, Al-Baghli N. Barriers facing physicians practicing evidence-based medicine in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions. 2004; 24(3): 163-170.
Al-Ansary L, Khoja T. The place of evidence-based medicine among primary health care physicians in Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia. Family Practice. 2002; 19(5): 537-542.
Booth A. Evidence-based practice and the developing world. Health Information & Libraries J. 2008; 25(1): 74-77.
Dans A, Dans L. The need and means for evidence-based medicine in developing countries. Evidence-Based Medicine. 2000; 5(4): 100-101.
Sabri A, Qayyum M. The problem of evidence-based medicine in developing countries. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2006; 175(1): 62-62.
Siddiqi K, Newell J. Putting evidence into practice in low-resource settings. Bulletin-World Health Organization. 2005; 83(12), 882.
Siddiqi K, Newell J, Robinson M. Getting evidence into practice: what works in developing countries?. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2005; 17(5): 447-454.
